According to The Fourth Period, Canucks General Manager Mike Gillis attended the Senators/Rangers game last night in New York.
At first this did feel like anything to be alarmed about, Vancouver is currently on a four-game road trip that had them on Long Island Monday night before hitting the Big Apple on Wednesday, so it's not like Gillis was there while the team was on a homestand.
Then I clued in that Ottawa has been trying to pry Mattias Ohlund away from Vancouver for a few weeks now, albeit through informal discussions.
Gillis was candid a few weeks ago that "It's not true" that he'd been shopping around Ohlund, "Mattias has a no-trade and we haven't discussed his status with any team and we're not going to. We have no interest in trading him. People ask us about every player and it's in general. I would never describe it as a trade discussion."
If that's the case, why go to the Sens game at all? There are clearly a million reasons to go there, but this seems as fishy as when Gillis met with Mats Sundin a few weeks ago.
The only good that could come out of potentially sending Ohlund to Ottawa, would be if Vancouver could get someone like Jason Spezza. I don't know how plausible that is with Spezza having signed a seven-year contract extension with the Senators in November 2007, but this whole post is speculation so let's continue the theme.
This season has been a waste for Spezza so far and Craig Hartsburg has let him know it. Coach has called out the player on two occasions now and as recent as eight days ago. Spezza had 15 points in 18 games so he's by no means been a blob on the ice this season, yet that total include one three point night and a four point night, meaning he's got eight points in 16 games excluding those two.
While I think Spezza would be a great fit in Vancouver, rumours are that Gillis is looking at Antoine Vermette. He's speedy, great at face-offs and able to perform on special teams, but there's no chance I would ever, ever, ever trade a solid puck moving defenceman like Ohlund for a weak top-six forward like Vermette.
If and when the Canucks do trade for a top-six forward, he needs to be a closer, someone who can finish off the 100 or so chances the team has to score from in close every game. Vermette doesn't strike me as that guy.